Saturday, May 14, 2022

ABC: A Buying Checklist

 Checklists are very useful even if they seem hackneyed. They might should be redundant. I am not going to have a full checklist, but a few principles to my checklist in this post.

 “The man who grasps principles can successfully select his own methods. The man who tries methods, ignoring principles, is sure to have trouble.” 
- Ralph Waldo Emerson

I am investing to provide the best risk adjusted return to compound my purchasing power. At a minimum this will involve beating inflation. 

It will be prudent to invest in companies that have a low capital expenditure as in an inflationary environment, it should capture royalties from the capital expendture of others.

Three hallmarks of a security that warrants further investigation: certain/recurring revenues, high return on capital, and the option of growth.

I will think about this as I investigate a list I have going forward: CDLX, ROKU, FTCH, Z, TDOC, GDRX and RCI. Seems like I have converted into the "growth" names, but I need to remind myself not to be fighting the last war. 

Saturday, April 23, 2022

Past and Present

"Predicting rain doesn't count. Building arks does." - Buffett

Macros are hard. I cashed out of my bet on RFP last year. I topticked it in May 2021 at ~$16 at about a third of my position. The final 2/3rds in August when I panick sold at $11.50 because I was worried about the lumber price. I got lucky. Lumber was an optionality of the original thesis. It was a favorable outcome for the bet once again. Unfortunately, I sunk most of the capital by beginning to use margin, shorting TSLA, and China. I was extremely worried about the valuation of the US market and inflation and thought the three would protect my portfolio. I still took on way too much risk for the reward says hindsight.

Maybe I should have just held on to cash as I had life needs. The eternal question of utility value vs. expected value. I have always trained myself to always go for expected value, but as I grow older, does it really matter the return on the capital rather than the return of capital.

Finally, ask yourself why you want to beat the market anyway. I once interviewed dozens of residents in Boca Raton, one of Florida’s richest retirement communities. Amid the elegant stucco homes, the manicured lawns, the swaying palm trees, the sun and the sea breezes, I asked these folks — mostly in their seventies — if they’d beaten the market over the course of their investing lifetimes. Some said yes, some said no. Then one man said, “Who cares? All I know is, my investments earned enough for me to end up in Boca.”

It was in July that I made most of the bets. The road not taken would have been a big position on MO at $48 (3.72 dividend for 7.75%), IMKTA at $60, and SFM $25. As of today, those would have been $55, $96, and $31 missing about a mean of 33% in returns vs. drawing down close to 60%. (Life comes at you fast.) 


Those would have been protection for my worries on inflation at a low risk, albeit boring. I chose to be fancy as I still think I learn more the way I went about, but expensive as it is now. Pain = Growth. Maybe still young enough to feel that way.

I made the BABA bet not just because of Charlie. I fell in love with the narrative of the TAM, the business models (Helmer's powers of scale, network advantage, and cornered resources). I thought China would be a hedge on the high valuations on US market and the headwinds of the inflation/deficit. I thought the fine BABA paid meant the CCP extracted their pound of flesh. I thought on a $200 entry x 2.72 billion shares for a market cap of 540 billion dollars was a decent price after backing out of the cash/investments to get a yield of 30b/480b conservatively for a 6.25% yeild on a growing company (I will post more on the other side of my China bet of ATHM in another post as it deserves a detailed dive). I forgot that cash flows are not predictable and maybe I didn't understand how not durable their competitive advantages would be if CCP decides to cap their growth or if the US negative sentiments might force a delisting/decoupling. It's hard to factor in Macro or try to factor it in even though in the end it does matter. Like clutch hits, there are definitely clutch hits but no clutch hitters.

Enough ruminating on the past. The possible mistakes that were made and lessons that can be drawn can't be dwelled on forever. Most importantly, can't be trapped in the past and need to live life forward.

“I know a lot of people have very strong and definite plans that they've worked out on all kinds of things, but we're subject to a tremendous number of outside influences and the vast majority of them cannot be predicted. So my idea is to stay flexible.”  
Henry Singleton

I need to focus on the most important thing. Compounding. Can't stop. Consistency. Continuation. I will keep reading to prepare for that opportunity even with low capital presently. I will continue to write and transcribe my thoughts to strengthen those preparations. I will continue to connect those strengths. I will continue growing.  

 

Saturday, March 5, 2022

Been a While and BABA

I need to start posting more because writing helps record my thought process in the moment. It helps with thinking and communicating. I will try to reconcile some of my past holdings that I neglected to post about here with the present and ultimately they will all lead to future decisions.

RFP worked out well in the past, but I have continued to change. The Terry Smith of Fundsmith has a pitch of what 2/20 means. In 2010, 45 years after the start of BRK, $1,000 would have compounded into 4.3 million dollars or 4,300x. If it had been structured as as 2/20 vehicle, the investor would have only compounded it to $300,000 or 300x. It is 13.5% CAGR vs. 20.5% for the 45 years. Yes, there are nuances in the calculations, but my takeaway is it will be far better to bet on myself and learn how to invest than pay fees.

It is difficult to pay anyone that amount, but one man that I probably would would be Charlie Munger. I am not sure if I am blindly just cloning him as I knew all the hype with China TAM yet it is a very red country and the Tech crackdown should show how everyone that is not the Party is just a cockroach. The Party does as it pleases like one can squash a cockroach at ease.

I truly believe BABA is a great business with a low capex in its core business of E-commerce. That excess cash flow is being invested into a variety of businesses and the crown jewel of AliCloud. AliPay can be considered a write-off even considering it was once valued at more than the 300 billion or so that the entire BABA is trading at today. Today, the Company is at 100 dollars a share or 273 billion dollar market cap. My various entry prices are averaging to 186 dollars. It has been brutal, but volatility is the price of equity returns. Hopefully, just the return of my capital here. Charlie is using leverage in this investment and I get his reasons. I am doing the same and had been before knowing he was "doubling down." I am not 98 and financially independent. I should be more cautious in my investments, but I also need to be aggressive if I ever want to "get there."

No matter the outcome of this one decision, the decision to learn from the wisdom of Munger should lead me to becoming more "wise." However, I would want this decision to work out financially as well. I have to remember to look past the short-term, but the leverage does put me in a precarious position to the swings. I am not sure how much more can my portfolio handle with the leverage, but have to risk it for the biscuit.